"The alpha male in adult society is likely to be confident, attractive, and wealthy. Questions remain as to whether the alpha male can retain mates, since relationships often require ability to compromise, to discuss feelings and to be sensitive...."

 

WiseGeek.com

Vintage

Something Different for Joomla!

Search

Fools Login

Members - Be sure to scroll down the page, where you can you access member profiles and check messages.





Forgot login?
No account yet? Register
Do you love movies? Then you should register with CFz. Registration is free.

Movie Loving Bastards

None

Google Ads

Our Cool Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter!
CoolFilmz Newsletter


Receive HTML?

Cheap Bastards Online

We have 47 guests online

FootballFansDiet Feed

Syndication

feed-image Feed Entries
Scratch Writing Mark

Folllow CFz

Tarantino Poll

What was Quentin Tarantino's best movie?
 
CoolFilmz.com
Unspooled: Saw Tintin The Other Day, My First 3D Movie Ever! PDF Print E-mail
( 1 Vote )
Features - Latest
Written by Matthew J. DeReno   
Tuesday, 17 January 2012 20:02

Movie ReelI saw my first 3D movie the other and was fairly blown away by the whole experience.  That the movie was The Adventures of Tintin and I got see it with my daughter on a big screen, with big tub of popcorn, and cool 3D glasses, made the experience all the better. 

3D or 2D, the child in me loves this type of animated flick anyway.  Tintin was sort of like an animated version of Indian Jones, but the effects were just amazing to me. The dust literally floated in front of my very eyes.  The swords pointed at me.  The background was away from me.  The wafting scroll, which solved the riddle of where the treasure was located, hung like a feather just out of my very own grasp. 

My daughter was equally amazed with both the yarn and the 3D experience.  She had many questions.  She inhaled and exhaled quite a bit during the high points of action and the low points of building drama. It was a great movie experience for her, one in which a lifelong love affair with movies may have been cemented, much like it happened for me when I saw Star Wars back in the 70s.

I must admit I was prejudiced against 3D.  I thought this was something that would come at the expense of story.  I should also mention that my truly first 3D experience at the movies was Spacehunter: Adventures in the Forbidden Zone (1983). Having seen Tintin, I now know that 3D coming at the expense of story is not the case by default.  in Tintin, The story was effectively rooted in the imagination and not the stereoscopic dimensions of the film itself.  There is no number that could prefix a D that can capture the limitless dimensions of the imagination like the mind of a child, no HD, no 3D.  The mind is Infinity D.  Short of reproducing that, I'll take Tintin in 3D.  It's a close approximation.

 
You need to login or register to post comments.
Discuss this item on the forums. (0 posts)


Bronson (2008) PDF Print E-mail
( 2 Votes )
Movie Reviews - Mob and Crime
Written by Kevin Meehan   
Friday, 13 January 2012 18:46

Bronson is essentially a biopic about a guy named Charles Bronson. Well that’s the name he goes by anyway. His real name is Michael Peterson and he’s notorious for being the most violent criminal in the British prison system. This film, by writer and director Nicolas Winding Refn, follows Peterson’s life as he builds that reputation in various institutions.

The main reason I knew anything about this movie is because Netflix has been pushing it pretty hard. For the last few months it has been prominent among the titles available for streaming that were recommended to me, so I figured I’d give it a try. After all, Refn directed the critically-acclaimed Drive, and Tom Hardy, who it seems has been in every movie - including Inception and the upcoming Dark Knight Rises - this past year or so, plays the title character. That combination of talent, I figured, made Bronson a worthwhile watch. And in the end I guess it was, although it could have been better.

 I say that because there was no real story line. No action rising to a climax. No change in character. Everything was static. From the very beginning of the film we know that Peterson, who, by the way, chose the name Charles Bronson as an alter ego of sorts for his days as an underground, bare-knuckle fighter, is crazy and violent. He gets in some fights as a child and keeps on fighting as he grows up. He tried to rob a bank and got put in jail where he repeatedly fights guards and other prisoners. Then he goes to the loony bin where he fights orderlies and other patients. By the end of the film, and after a few too many Tom Hardy dong shots, he’s no more or less crazy or violent.

I get what Refn is doing, though. Having seen Drive, it’s clear what style he’s going for; he’s trying to establish a directorial flair that is his and his alone. He’s not so much concerned about story as he is about being artistic. And that’s fine. That’s why Bronson wasn’t a total letdown. Much like Drive, Bronson has very little dialogue. There’s a lot of suspenseful silence and fancy camera work and lighting techniques backed by synth beats. The majority of the speaking, in fact, comes from soliloquies by Hardy. Every five or 10 minutes the film cuts to Hardy standing on stage, with his face painted in various ways, before a crowd of well-dressed theatergoers. Even these scenes are attempts to be artsy. The best example of which is when he’s explaining a conversation with a nurse at the mental hospital. Half of his face is unpainted and the other half is painted to look like a woman. Hardy turns back and forth, revealing the profile of whoever is talking, the male or the female.

Moments like that make this film all the more strange and therefore not for everyone. If you’re looking for a structured story, Bronson is not for you. But if you are interested in the art of filmmaking than it’s worth a watch. Refn has gained a lot of acclaim for Drive and is poised to become one of the better-known directors of the next decade. And Hardy is one of the more quickly up and coming actors. Why else would he be in every freaking movie? Throughout Bronson, the title character says how he always wanted to be famous. I guess now that there’s a movie about him he got what he wanted. His fame, however, looks like it will be far surpassed by that of the people who made the film. Overall it’s worth of a Queen rating. The British should appreciate that.

 
You need to login or register to post comments.
Discuss this item on the forums. (0 posts)


Unknown (2011) PDF Print E-mail
( 0 Votes )
Movie Reviews - Thriller and Action
Written by Matthew J. DeReno   
Wednesday, 20 July 2011 19:06

KingWhen did Liam Neeson become the best action star there is? I will take Neeson's frazzled, frenetic, yet-I-kick-major-ass when it comes down to it over your typical sculpted Vin Diesel action hero any day.  Why? I think because Neeson has an everyday type of guy appearance to him, it lends more to the action.  Like, "wow, look at this totally un-ripped dude out there beating some spy ass."  Call it the Gene Hackman cool guy factor.  Maybe the Bruce Willis cool guy factor.  I like heroes that remind me, of, well, me.  Nah, I can't even go that far.  Any of the dudes I just mentioned make me look like Fat Albert.

In Unknown, Neeson plays the lead guy who is on a trip to Germany with his wife (super hot psycho-bitch-player January Jones) , when one thing leads to another, he finds himself taxi that runs a ledge and is plummeting into an icy cold river.  He is saved by his super hot taxi driver (Diane Kruger).  He is out of it for a few days and then he decides to go to the conference and find his wife (much like any normal dude would do).  Problem is when he arrives at the hotel his wife doesn't remember anything about him. He is unknown to her. Did I mention she has a new husband with his name?

Read more: Unknown (2011)
 
You need to login or register to post comments.
Discuss this item on the forums. (0 posts)


True Grit (2010) PDF Print E-mail
( 0 Votes )
Movie Reviews - The Wild Wild West
Written by Matthew J. DeReno   
Wednesday, 29 June 2011 18:43

For a Coen Brothers movie, the violence in True Grit was pretty much non-violent, but in a good Unforgiven style of manner.  True Grit  features an impressive cast: Hailee Steinfeld as Mattie Ross and Jeff Bridges as U.S. Marshal Reuben J. "Rooster" Cogburn along with Matt Damon, Josh Brolin, and Barry Pepper. Jeff Bridges as Rooster Cogburn, a U.S. Marshall Gun-For-Hire, was iconic.  He was perhaps as iconic as a true icon that once holstered a six-shooter in this role.  Who was that?  Man, it was The Duke.  With a spot-on, Oscar-worthy performance,  Bridges not only served up justice to the coward Tom Chaney, a murderer of a little girl's dad, but to The Duke as well.

True Grit (2010) is a remake of an earlier well-known John Wayne effort of the same title  This version was as good as a western as I can remember in recent years.  Dare I say this western is probably the best of this decade, but the decade is only a year old or so...  Who knows what might come down the trail and shoot up the town between this year and another nine.

Hailee Steinfeld as Mattie Ross was beyond charming and endearing.  She struck a highly believable chord as a 14-year old kid who was smart and merely wanted to seek revenge on a dastardly man who murdered her father to bring balance to way things should be.  However, you got the sense, that deep within her, there was buried emotion, but the emotion never surfaced except for subtle yet exceptionally poignant moments when you could see surprise and wonder sprout up in her eyes. She had "true grit" to the end, and in my opinion, this is the true grit in which the title truly refers. 

Read more: True Grit (2010)
 
You need to login or register to post comments.
Discuss this item on the forums. (0 posts)


Country Strong (2011) PDF Print E-mail
( 0 Votes )
Movie Reviews - Drama and Suspense
Written by Matthew J. DeReno   
Wednesday, 27 April 2011 02:50

Country Strong (2011) should be titled Country Wrong.  I don't buy this sappy stitch-together one bit.  It is cliched, campy, and frankly, boring.  It is not a terrible flick.  It was filmed in a competent manner.  It has likable stars, even real country stars like Tim McGraw, but there is not much country in Country Strong.  Instead there is campy.  Hell, the music is as good as half the country crap you will hear today (this is coming from a John Cash fan - not a country music hater). 

The plot involves Gweneth Paltrow as an alcoholic singer who is perhaps in the sunset of her career.  There is an up and coming starlet that tags along with them and throw into the mix a young stud who will eventually have the hots for both of them.  Tim McGraw is the Patlrow's stage manager who obviously has feelings for her, but pushes her for the glory of the road show.

So what were the flicks biggest transgressions?  Too vanilla.  Boring.  Too nice.  Even the assholes were good people.

You want to see a better country strong movie I would suggest Walk The Line (2005) and Crazy Heart (2009).  Going back in time, check out Coal Miner's Daughter (1980) or Tender Mercies (1983).  This flick wants to be mentioned in the same breath of those but only will succeed when mentioned in terms of how it doesn't even come close to any of them. I deal it a Jack.    

 

 
You need to login or register to post comments.
Discuss this item on the forums. (0 posts)


Hereafter (2010) PDF Print E-mail
( 0 Votes )
Movie Reviews - Drama and Suspense
Written by Matthew J. DeReno   
Monday, 25 April 2011 11:37

queenHereafter (2010) . There Before After.  Not sure that is quite witty, but wit is needed when pondering this plodding sentimental thought of a movie, of which the best part happened literally before the movie ever got started.

The tsunami scene in the opening of the flick was pretty awesome and compelling.  If that scene does not capture what is likely the horror of being swept away in a tsunami, I don't think any film can. 

In fact, for that scene alone, this film gets a queen.  If not, we are talking a Jack.  In fact, that scene alone might be worth watching the whole flick, but there again we live in the age of YouTube.

Okay, now that you have seen the best part of this film, I will explain where the plot got swept away with the impressive wave.  You see we have Matt Damon as a psychic who can communicate with the dead.  He is just about the most boring dude you could imagine.  I am not sure why everyone in this film had to be boring, introspective, and pondering.  Even the boy actor in the film was for some reason boring.  Yes, it was compelling that his mother was an addict and he had a special need to not let his older brother go, but i don't know, just a boring kid.

The biggest problem with the film is it is too slow to develop and disjointed. There are three stories going on in sort of a Crash (2004) format of separate but equal stories.  We are waiting for them in Hereafter to come together, but it takes too long and for some reason, it seems contrived when it does happen.  I also was "wowed" by the idea of the film.  The French chick, quite hot, journalist pretty much gave up her career to write a book about the conspiracy of silence surrounding the hereafter.  Hmm.  I guess it has nothing to do with most such people that live for the hereafter and not the before-now are simply wacko weirdos.

Clint Eastwood directed this film and like most Eastwood directed films it is well directed.  He does have a knack for framing a shot.  I will give him that.  As for framing the hereafter?  I think he should make a film about a tsunami. 

 

 
You need to login or register to post comments.
Discuss this item on the forums. (0 posts)


<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 22